Search for: "WILLIAM S. STICKMAN" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2020, 9:08 am by Tom Smith
District Judge William Stickman IV on Sept. 14 sided with plaintiffs that included drive-in movie theaters, hair salons, farmers markets, and several GOP officials who sued as individuals. [read post]
Judge William Stickman ruled last week that Wolf’s restrictions on gatherings, his order to close “non-life-sustaining” businesses and his order directing Pennsylvania residents to stay at home were unconstitutional. [read post]
” However, Judge Brooks of the Third Circuit invalidated Stickmans order by granting a stay pending appeal. [read post]
” Judge William Stickman IV wrote in his opinion: There is no question that this country has faced, and will face, emergencies of every sort. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 6:24 am by Aaron Zeamer
Booking Events While the Constitutionality of the Governor’s Restrictions is In Limbo Revisiting the decision by Judge William Stickman IV, you may have heard or read the reports that the Judge refused to stay or suspend the effectiveness of his decision until the Governor’s office resolves its appeal. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 11:32 am by Aaron Zeamer
Federal Judge’s Ruling that Wolf’s Coronavirus Restrictions Were Unconstitutional Is Not What You Think Moving on to the issue that has generated the most headlines this week: the Opinion from Judge William Stickman IV, a federal court judge in western Pennsylvania, declaring Governor Tom Wolf’s coronavirus shutdown unconstitutional on the grounds that it violated the 1st and 14th amendments of the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Yet, as Federal District Judge William Stickman observed in a Pennsylvania case in September of this year, although “Jacobson has been cited by some modern courts as ongoing support for a broad, hands-off deference to state authorities in matters of health and safety, other courts and commentators have questioned whether it remains instructive in light of the intervening jurisprudential development. [read post]